Derivative markets.... An understandable explanation, in less than 5 minutes:
Heidi is the proprietor of a bar in Kansas City. In order to increase sales, she decides to allow her loyal customers - most of whom are unemployed alcoholics - to drink now but pay later. She keeps track of the drinks consumed on a ledger (thereby granting the customers loans).
Word gets around about Heidi's drink now pay later marketing strategy and as a result, increasing numbers of customers flood into Heidi's bar and soon she has the largest sale volume for any bar in Kansas City.
By providing her customers' freedom from immediate payment demands, Heidi gets no resistance when she substantially increases her prices for wine and beer, the most consumed beverages. Her sales volume increases massively.
A young and dynamic vice-president at the local bank recognizes these customer debts as valuable future assets and increases Heidi's borrowing limit.
He sees no reason for undue concern since he has the debts of the alcoholics as collateral. At the bank's corporate headquarters, expert traders transform these customer loans into DRINKBONDS, ALKIBONDS and PUKEBONDS. These securities are then traded on security markets worldwide.
Naive investors don't really understand the securities being sold to them as AAA secured bonds are really the debts of unemployed alcoholics, since the bond rating agencies are paid by the banks selling these bonds, of course they're AAA rated, and no one in the Federal Government is providing close scrutiny. Nevertheless, their prices continuously climb, and the securities become the top-selling items for some of the nation's leading brokerage houses.
One day, although the bond prices are still climbing, a risk manager at the bank (subsequently fired due his negativity), decides that the time has come to demand payment on the debts incurred by the drinkers at Heidi's bar. A 50 to 1 debt ratio is not healthy (he learned when getting his MBA), but alot of good that did him now that he's assistant manager at a Wendys.
Heidi demands payment from her alcoholic patrons, but being unemployed they cannot pay back their drinking debts. Therefore, Heidi cannot fulfill her loan obligations and claims bankruptcy.
DRINKBOND and ALKIBOND drop in price by 90%. PUKEBOND performs better, stabilizing in price after dropping by 80%. The decreased bond asset value destroys the banks liquidity and prevents it from issuing new loans..
The suppliers of Heidi's bar, having granted her generous payment extensions and having invested in the securities are faced with writing off her debt and losing over 80% on her bonds. Her wine supplier claims bankruptcy, her beer supplier is taken over by a competitor, who immediately closes the local plant and lays off 50 workers.
The bank and brokerage houses are saved by the Government following dramatic round-the-clock negotiations by leaders from both political parties. The funds required for this bailout are obtained by a tax levied on employed middle-class non-drinkers.
This summarizes the current situation, pretty accurately. No?
9 years ago
It's ok. Not entirely accurate.
ReplyDelete(1) Overall, this seems to want to explain the mortgage derivates markets. Subset.
(2) "unemployed alcoholics"
why unemployed? this analogy seems to buy into the blame-the-poor argument from the right about the housing bubble
(3) demand & pricing
To make this story accurate, the bars customers should be buying overpriced drinks because of the expectation that the value of the drinks would rise and that they could sell them later and make a profit. Houses are durable goods. Drinks are consumables. Very bad analogy here.
The subsequent securitization of the cash flows is spot-on, though.
(4)tax on middle-class
Hm. Maybe. Smacks of the same right-wing slant as the blame-the-poor aspect. As far as I know, there was no tax increase on the middle class, and Obama is decreasing taxes on the middle class, so this extra "tax levied on the middle class" for the bailout doesn't yet correlate with anything that's actually happened.