Since the early 80s, I've had pretty much the same hair cut. I call it the "Ted Koppel" (link here). The Sr year college resumes I sent out had a little wallet sized of a 20 year old JoeP with the Koppel cut. 6 years after that when I changed jobs for the first time, again, another variation on the Koppel cut. So now I am in Southern California, and the Koppel cut is rather antiquated. Ted's a great journalist, I just need to divorce myself from his hair cut.
So the two variations I am considering are here:
link 1
and here:
link 2
I can't decide which one will work better... but either will be better than the perennial Koppel cut.
JustJoeP visitors and followers are encouraged to comment here... and voice their opinions.
10 years ago
or Option 3?
ReplyDeleteI recommend letting DDF choose. She's the one who has to look at it the most. If she refuses, get a hair stylist you trust and have them do what they think looks/works best with your hair. Or just get the clippers out and go low-cost, low-maint.
ReplyDeleteThe likes all three... so I am going to go with the option that requires the least "product". I am no fan of "product".
ReplyDeleteI had the same person for 5 years cut my hair in Phoenix... and have yet to locate a Southern Californian stylist... but DDF has a place (next to an Ace Hardware, which I see a a plus) =)